Skip to main content

Service

System Architecture

The data model, service boundaries and trust boundaries decided and written down before the build, sized for the load you actually expect.

Overview

Most architecture problems are not discovered in a review — they are discovered in production, under load, at the worst possible time. By then the fix is a migration rather than a decision.

We design the system before it is built, or reassess it before it is extended further: the data model, the service boundaries, the trust boundaries and the failure modes, written down with the reasoning attached so the design can be defended, not just diagrammed.

Capabilities

What system architecture covers

  • Architecture design and review

    Service boundaries, data ownership and integration patterns decided deliberately, or an independent review of an existing design against your actual load and growth plans.

  • Data modelling

    Schemas and storage choices made for the access patterns you actually have, not the ones a generic template assumes.

  • Threat modelling

    Trust boundaries and data flows mapped so security decisions are made deliberately during design, not discovered during an audit.

  • Capacity and scaling plans

    Sizing the architecture for the load you expect, with the specific points that will need to change identified before they become incidents.

Process

How we deliver it

The four stages system architecture moves through, and what you have at the end of each.

  1. Understand the load

    The current or expected traffic, data volumes and growth plans quantified, so the design is sized for a real number, not a guess.

  2. Design the boundaries

    Services, data ownership and trust boundaries decided together, with the reasoning for each written down.

  3. Stress-test the design

    The design checked against the failure cases and growth scenarios that are most likely to break it, before anything is built on top of it.

  4. Document and hand over

    Architecture decision records and diagrams your team can maintain and extend without needing the original conversation replayed to them.

Copy pending founder sign-off

PRD §8 requires the exact scope of each service to be confirmed before final copy. Outstanding for this one:

  • Whether architecture review is offered as a standalone engagement or only alongside a build
  • Typical engagement length and commercial model for architecture work

Related work

No published case studies yet

We publish case studies only once the client has approved the wording, and none are cleared for publication yet. Ask us directly and we'll talk you through comparable work under NDA.

Ask about comparable work

Get started

Request a quote for system architecture

Tell us what you need and we'll come back with a scope, a price and the risks as we see them.

Prefer to talk first? Send a short message and we'll set up a call.

Draft copy

Include the country code.

Optional, but it helps us propose something realistic. Any currency, and a range is fine.

What needs to exist, what problem it solves, and any constraints we should know about — compliance, deadlines, systems it has to work with.

Commercially sensitive details are best left out of a web form — tell us enough to scope it and we'll take the rest over a call.

Also available

Other capabilities

  • Payment & Fintech Integrations

    Payment, collection and disbursement flows integrated end to end, with every transaction landing in a known, reconciled state.

  • UI/UX Design

    Research, interface design and reusable design systems — accessible by construction, not by later remediation.

  • Digital Transformation

    Sequenced modernisation of how the organisation works — prioritised by payback, delivered in stages that each stand alone.